compound 8 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Compound 8, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/compound 8/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Cysteine availability tunes ubiquitin signaling via inverse stability of LRRC58 E3 ligase and its substrate CDO1"
Article Title: Cysteine availability tunes ubiquitin signaling via inverse stability of LRRC58 E3 ligase and its substrate CDO1
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-72524-3
Figure Legend Snippet: a Left panel displays the reporter assay showing single Lys to Arg CDO1 reporter variants expressed in HEK293T cells grown in complete or cysteine-free media. K8R CDO1 levels were minimally affected upon cysteine starvation in contrast to all other CDO1 mutants, which showed wild-type like responses. The right panel is the same as the left except comparing cells grown in complete media and treated with Compound 8 (Cmpd 8) or DMSO where all CDO1 reporter variants are efficiently degraded. Bars represent the average values from n = 4 independent replicates. Error bars report the standard deviation of the data points. b Left panel shows in vitro reconstituted assays comparing Cy5-labeled WT and K8R CDO1 ubiquitylation in the presence of neddylated LRRC58-CUL2 or neddylated VHL-CUL2 with Cmpd8. The efficiency of K8R CDO1 ubiquitylation is lower with LRRC58-CUL2 compared to WT CDO1 but minimally affected in the presence of VHL-CUL2 and Cmpd8. Assay on left was performed with wild-type ubiquitin (WT Ub). The right panel is the same as the left, but performed using a lysine-less ubiquitin (K 0 -Ub) that cannot form chains. Fluorescence scans are representative of n = 3 technical replicates. Source data provided as Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Reporter Assay, Standard Deviation, In Vitro, Labeling, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: a Residues along the LRRC58-CDO1 interface of the structure representing CDO1 (orange) ubiquitylation by LRRC58 (purple) with neddylated CUL5-RBX2-ARIH2 are labeled and shown in full opacity. Residues found mutated in patients are labeled in bold. b The LRRC58-CDO1 interface is subdivided into patches. D-patch residues, involved in degrader-induced interaction with VHL, are shown with respect to the interface patches on the right. CDO1 patch schematic shown below. c CDO1-Cmpd8-VHL-EloB/C crystal structure (PDB:8VL9, CDO1 light gray, VHL dark gray, Compound 8 (Cmpd8) white) aligned to CDO1 (orange) of the sample representing CDO1 ubiquitylation by LRRC58 with neddylated CUL5-RBX2-ARIH2. Hydrogen bonding interactions are shown (black dotted lines). d Cmpd8-mediated recruitment of CDO1 to VHL orients CDO1 differently than LRRC58, shown by alignment of a chimeric structure of VHL-Cmpd8-CDO1 (PDB:8VL9) in complex with CUL2 NTD -EloB/C (PDB:4WQO) to the fitted model of the LRRC58-CDO1-CUL2 complex. On left, lysines are colored as dark-blue spheres; Lys8 position is highlighted in a dark-blue circle. Sites of patient mutations, H147 and E143 (green and pink spheres, respectively), are highlighted with black circles, on right. e Summary of CDO1 mutations used. f Reporter stability for CDO1 variants expressed in HEK293T cells grown in complete or cysteine-free media. All mutations made to CDO1 patches lose sensitivity to cysteine starvation, whereas D-patch mutations respond. g Reporter stability as in ( d ) except comparing cells gown in complete media and treated with Cmpd8 or DMSO. All CDO1 variants are efficiently degraded, including the patient variants, except for D-patch mutations. h In vitro reconstituted assays comparing WT and mutant Cy5-CDO1 ubiquitylation by neddylated LRRC58-CUL2. Mutations only in patch interfaces, including patient variants, reduced CDO1 ubiquitylation. i Same as in ( h ) except with neddylated VHL-CUL2 and Cmpd8. CDO1 patch mutants, and all patient variants, show WT-like ubiquitylation efficiencies, but D-patch mutants display reduced ubiquitylation. In ( f ) and ( g ), the average values from n = 4 independent replicates are shown with error bars reporting standard deviation. Fluorescence scans in ( h ) and ( i ) are representative of n = 2 technical replicates. Source data provided as Source Data file.
Techniques Used: Labeling, In Vitro, Mutagenesis, Standard Deviation, Fluorescence

